Fong et al v. Grenville-Germain Calgary Limited Partnership McLennan Ross acted when it comes to directors of the organization which constructed within an action commenced with respect to the owners of the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and inadequacies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for the transportation that is international with regards to an action involving a big travel facilitator in addition to incorporation of gas surcharges when you look at the calculation of expenses.
Kilroy v. A payday that is ok loans et al it was A uk Columbia class action against lots of cash advance operations, for which McLennan Ross represented three regarding the Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our consumers. Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross had been counsel to the auditors in this course of action, a proceeding that is“representative ahead of the utilization of class procedures legislation in Alberta, that has been brought with respect to every one of the investors in 2 subsidiaries of this Principal Group, an economic conglomerate that failed. The situation had been settled ahead of exams for finding.
Lahaie v. Goodyear it was a course action against Goodyear. McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta at the request of British Columbia counsel, that has currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The matter ended up being settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought in British Columbia from the major operators within the loan industry that is payday. McLennan Ross ended up being counsel to 1 regarding the Defendants. We had been successful in opposing a credit card applicatoin for official official official https://personalinstallmentloans.org/payday-loans-wa/ certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this course of action as against our consumers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this class that is proposed, the Plaintiff advertised from the Alberta national and also the College of Chiropractors that one therapy had been harmful and may never be allowed within the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a credit card applicatoin to really have the claim dismissed ahead of certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer prior to the application was argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross had been tangled up in a course action brought by pet owners alleging this 1 associated with major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta didn’t have quality settings in destination which led to the loss of home animals from tainted food. This litigation had been solved by settlement among the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for starters regarding the Defendants in this course of action which desired an interpretation of this Insurance Act and a return of every deductible charged where there was clearly a loss that is total of at issue. The action ended up being fixed in preference of the Defendants after a synopsis determination of the true point of legislation. Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross ended up being counsel towards the Plaintiffs in this putative class action which advertised investment fraudulence and securities violations. It had been discontinued after settlement utilizing the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial Options Centres McLennan Ross ended up being counsel to your Defendants in this class action brought against a loan that is payday within the Province of Alberta, that was solved within the general settlement associated with the Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our customers (see Bruley and Downey above).
Western Canada Buying Centres v. Dutton McLennan Ross acted for just one associated with the defendants in this longstanding course action for several years.
Bank of America et al Class actions have already been filed against Visa, MasterCard, and a number of banking institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings with respect to Canadian merchants who accepted re payment for products or solutions by means of Visa or MasterCard charge cards linked to solution costs and limitations on company methods that have been required so that you can accept payments that are such. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for just one for the Defendant institutions that are financial. The issues are susceptible to case that is coordinated and they are ongoing.